Why would anyone say Solar PV isn't cost effective when in CA you can lease for the current cost of your bill?
Are people seriously misinformed about Solar PV and small residential wind turbines? Have you ever gotten any estimates? In 21 States the power company buys your power, and supplies you power at night. As your bill goes up you save. How is that not cost effective. Why do people cling to misinformation and refuse to accept renewable energy and toss off the yolk of Oil, step by step?
Solar is an excellent option in California. But California gets a great deal of sun.
In Pacific Northwest, though, it will take many, many years for a homeowner to recover the cost of solar panels in energy savings. And likewise, in the most populous areas of the country, it isn't windy enough for people to recover the cost of wind turbines in a reasonable amount of time. And really, by the time people recover the cost, the equipment will need to be replaced.
I think that large-scale renewable energy is the solution, not small-scale. Building large solar plants in the southwest to convert water into hydrogen could fuel all of our cars. Building wind turbines off-shore could fuel all our homes. But power companies are going to be needed to do those things.
SolarPV.TV News (40 DE): Intersolar Europe 2010 in München
[simpleaffiliate source="amazon" results="10"]solar pv[/simpleaffiliate]
[simpleaffiliate source="clickbank" results="5"]solar pv[/simpleaffiliate]
No comments:
Post a Comment